Commercial photography is supposedly a for profit endeavor. And on a good day it is. Alas, there have always been far too many days when I've suspected that there might not be as much profit in the words, FOR PROFIT, as I would like. A 501(c)3 company, on the other hand, is a NOT FOR PROFIT Corporation. Charities are a perfect example. The last time I looked at my tax form the box for charity was not checked.
I received an email from an experienced advertising professional recently. She is an Art Buyer at a major agency here in town and was sourcing photos for a project. The agency is developing a poster for their client to celebrate the 100th year anniversary of a major customer of the client. They are going to need a ton of photographs. Perhaps, they’ll need as many as 100, if they want one for each year. You get my drift. It’s big.
This was a lengthy, 6 paragraph email, that talked about all the effort being put into the project. Intimating how the agency was putting the “full court press” on to complete the project successfully. Then someone had an idea! Let’s reach out to the local photographic community. They were positive that the studios and photographers all had hundreds of available photographs in their archives.
Buried in the 3rd paragraph was the last sentence which concluded with, “and unfortunately will not be able to pay any usage to the photographer.” No usage fee? RUT-ROW! No research fee? Huh? No credit line? You can’t be serious? Say it isn’t so Joe, err…Josephine.
Unfortunately she was serious. Of course, if I had a long-standing relationship with this client I might think differently. Or, if I had a long standing relationship with the buyer that could also affect my opinion. But I don’t and neither do any of my photographers. As it is, I’m just embarrassed for her.
Now, I think it’s time to go make the doughnuts.
Cheers,
Mike
Chief Instigation Officer


